The document points out that, if 100% scanning of exports was implemented in European ports it would be excessively costly, would be unlikely to improve global security, would absorb resources currently allocated to EU security interests, and would disrupt trade and transport within the EU and worldwide. It suggested that as an alternative, priority should be given to investing in enhancing multi-layered risk management systems for targeting and inspecting dangerous cargo, and to strengthening international cooperation to facilitate this process.
According to the report, with global maritime shipping routes forming the backbone of international trade, strengthening the security of the supply chain via effective security measures is a major EU priority. However, implementing 100% scanning would require sizeable investments and significantly increase transport costs.
You need a free subscription to read the entire article.
Subscribe
Subscribe for FREE and gain access to all our content.
More than 5000+ articles.