CK Hutchison Escalates Panama Canal Terminals Dispute

Hong Kong operator warns APM Terminals of legal action as treaty claim and ICC arbitration deepen tensions over Balboa and Cristobal concessions

CK Hutchison Panama Canal dispute

CM article: CK Hutchison Escalates Panama Canal Terminals Dispute

CK Hutchison has escalated its fight over the Panama Canal terminals at Balboa and Cristobal, warning A.P. Moller-Maersk that any move by APM Terminals to assume operations without consent would trigger legal action and damages claims. In a 12 February statement, the Hong Kong-headquartered operator confirmed it had formally notified Panama of a treaty dispute—elevating what began as a commercial disagreement into an investment protection claim under international law.

The warning followed Panama’s Supreme Court ruling in late January that Law No. 5 of 1997, the legal foundation for CK Hutchison’s nearly three-decade concession, was unconstitutional. Panama’s Maritime Authority subsequently announced APM Terminals (APMT) would serve as temporary administrator during a transition period. Hutchison’s subsidiary Panama Ports Company (PPC), which operates Balboa on the Pacific side and Cristobal at the Atlantic entrance, commenced International Chamber of Commerce arbitration on 3 February.

The dispute threatens to complicate CK Hutchison’s already-stalled US$22.8bn deal to sell its stake in 43 ports across 23 countries. Announced on 4 March 2025, the transaction would have seen BlackRock’s Global Infrastructure Partners take a 51% stake in the Panama terminals, with MSC’s Terminal Investment Limited (TiL) holding 49%. The broader portfolio was structured with TiL as lead investor.

You need a free subscription to read the entire article.

Subscribe

Subscribe for FREE and gain access to all our content.
More than 5000+ articles.

Exit mobile version